India
BIS chief warns stablecoins cannot serve as mass‑payment tool, cites stability risks
Photo: tarkesh jha

BIS chief warns stablecoins cannot serve as mass‑payment tool, cites stability risks

Bank for International Settlements head Agustín Carstens said stablecoins lack the credibility needed for large‑scale payments, raising alarms over financial stability and money‑laundering concerns, especially for economies outside the United States.

In a recent interview, Agustín Carstens, the governor of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), warned that stablecoins – digital assets pegged to a fiat currency or a basket of assets – are not a credible means of payment when used at scale. While stablecoins have attracted considerable investor interest because they promise the price stability of traditional money combined with the speed of blockchain transactions, Carstens argued that the underlying infrastructure and regulatory oversight are insufficient for them to replace conventional payment rails. He highlighted that most stablecoins are issued by private firms that lack the balance‑sheet strength and public‑sector accountability that central banks provide, making them vulnerable to runs and operational failures.

Carstens also pointed to the growing apprehension among regulators worldwide about the potential for stablecoins to facilitate money‑laundering and other illicit activities. The BIS chief noted that, unlike traditional banks, many stablecoin issuers operate across borders with limited transparency, complicating the task of monitoring suspicious transactions. While the United States has taken a relatively proactive stance in drafting comprehensive crypto regulations, Carstens said that jurisdictions outside the U.S. are lagging, creating a patchwork of rules that could undermine global financial stability.

ALSO READ | India and ASEAN Nations Chart Scalable Agricultural Cooperation at Summit

The BIS chief’s remarks come at a time when Indian policymakers are actively debating the regulatory framework for digital assets. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has already imposed a ban on private cryptocurrencies in 2023 and is now evaluating the role of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as a sovereign alternative to private stablecoins. Carstens’ cautionary stance adds weight to the argument that India should prioritize a robust, government‑backed digital payment system rather than relying on privately issued stablecoins for mass adoption.

Video: OBOOK Holdings (OWLS) CEO Darren Wang on Regulated Stablecoin Payments, OwlPay Growth and 2026 Goals
Watch on YouTube ↗
Why This Matters

Carstens’ warning is significant for India because the country is rapidly digitising its payments ecosystem and grappling with how to integrate emerging crypto‑assets. If stablecoins were to be adopted widely without stringent oversight, they could bypass the RBI’s monetary controls, potentially destabilising the rupee and complicating anti‑money‑laundering enforcement. Moreover, India’s large unbanked population could be attracted to the promise of low‑cost, instant transfers offered by stablecoins, amplifying the need for clear policy direction.

The BIS chief’s comments also reinforce the RBI’s ongoing push for a digital rupee, a central bank digital currency designed to combine the benefits of blockchain technology with full regulatory oversight. By highlighting the systemic risks of private stablecoins, Carstens indirectly supports India’s strategy to develop a sovereign digital currency that can serve as a safe, scalable alternative for everyday transactions, while preserving the integrity of the financial system.

Reporting based on verified dispatches from CNBCTV18. View primary release ↗
Stay Connected
Follow SamacharDaily on Instagram

Visual explainers, infographics, and daily news briefings on your feed.

More in India